The Introduction and Wiggle Words.

Stormy Daniels signed the letter, published on January 10, 2018 — but (her attorney) Davison testified he wrote it himself.

"TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I recently became aware that certain news outlets are alleging that I had a sexual and/or romantic affair with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago," the statement began. "I am stating with complete clarity that this is absolutely false."

The underlined words/phrases have a great deal of wiggle room - enabling the author to deceive the reader into thinking there was no romantic “affair” or sexual activity (an “affair” is longer term, not a single event) while not stating there was no “sexual” activity. She also begins with the introduction, “I am stating …” which is not definitive.

The introduction, “I am stating …” is also a partial truth. She is “stating” .. “that this is absolutely false.” This is a partially truthful statement since she is “stating .. “that this is absolutely false” - however, it is intentionally misleading the readers, therefore, it's not the complete truth. Much like Lance Armstrong’s falsehood, “I have never doped. I can say it again … but I’ve said it for seven years.” 2005.

People can “say” anything when they introduce it with “I can say ..” or “I am stating ..” Those are deceptive tactics. Be careful and pay attention to introductions and wiggle words.

Walt Reca is DB Cooper - Follow the Evidence.

Mike Halkovich Hi Joe Koenig Anything new concerning the Jimmy Hoffa case? Do you think the Hoffa or DBC case is more difficult? Thanks.

Thanks, Mike. Great question. To my knowledge, there is nothing new on the Hoffa case. Remember, though, I retired from MSP in 1993. The cases are very different. Both were massive and complex cases. I was assigned as lead investigator the day after Hoffa was reported missing, so there were exigent circumstances. I worked the Cooper case as a cold case, with few time pressures and no exigency. Both were and are very difficult. I'm convinced Walt Reca is D.B. Cooper based on Walt's confession, a very credible eye witness, independent and verified corroboration of Walt's confession, my analysis of the taped confession/statements recorded by the very credible and late Carl Laurin, and all the circumstantial evidence. Finally, several former prosecutors, like the one I posted from the late and famous L. Brooks Patterson, reviewed my case facts and concluded they would have indicted Walt as D.B. Cooper. Joe Koenig

Walt Reca is D.B. Cooper

“Joe Koenig’s meticulous assessment of the case against or for Walt Reca as D.B. Cooper is objective, deep and highly persuasive. It should be a model for writers of critical analyses of other cases yet to be offered of other mysteries. Precious few of the tens of thousands of police reports I have reviewed as federal and state prosecutor match this work.”

—John Smietanka, Former US Attorney and Principal Associate Deputy US Attorney General